Ein Beitrag aus QiW 2026|1

Brigitte Ecker, Clemens Reindl & Mario Steyer

Abstract:
With more than 9,000 students, the University of Applied Sciences Campus Vienna (HCW) is Austria’s largest university of applied sciences. Offering more than 60 degree programmes and numerous courses and continuing education programmes, it provides a comprehensive range of tertiary education. Due to the heterogeneous range of services, a grid of institutionalised evaluation (evaluation matrix) is to be created and contrasted using the example of HCW, based on three core pillars of institutional responsibility and the range of services offered.

Different formats of evaluation are necessary in order to identify or measure different subject areas, agendas, needs, etc. In a best case scenario, the different evaluation approaches should contribute to supporting the institutional development and learning of the organisation. In view of this, the aim of this article is also to show how the circle of individual evaluation approaches can be opened up to institutional learning, and how this can also be used to control the qualitative growth (and subsequently quantitative growth) of a university. In addition to strategy and evaluation methodologies, this requires mindsets that not only implement the evaluation formats well (in the sense of quality assurance), but also a comprehensive process that enables, among other things, the further development of the persons entrusted with evaluation (i.e. capacity building).

The article therefore begins by providing an overview of different evaluation approaches in organisation, teaching and research. Building on this, it addresses the question of how evaluation can be effectively embedded in an institution or organisation in order to ultimately support university management and institutional development in an effective and goal-oriented manner. A further question is to what extent theoretical growth models can be used for institutional development.

A mile wide – An inch deep? Institutionalisierte Ansätze und Strukturen von Evaluierung an der Hochschule Campus Wien (ePaper) – UniversitätsVerlagWebler

Die REvaluation Conference 2027 lädt Wissenschaftler:innen, politische Entscheidungsträger:innen, Praktiker:innen und Evaluator:innen ein, zu einem internationalen Dialog über die Zukunft der Evaluierung von Forschung, Technologie und Innovation beizutragen. Unter dem übergeordneten Thema und Motto „Scouting paths on shifting maps“ untersucht die Konferenz, wie Evaluierung in Zeiten beschleunigten Wandels und zunehmenden Drucks auf Wissenschafts- und Innovationssysteme relevant, verantwortungsvoll und konstruktiv bleiben kann.

Beiträge können ab jetzt bis 31. Juli 2026 eingereicht werden.

Alle Informationen zum Call finden Sie HIER

Wir freuen uns, bekannt zu geben, dass Verena Grubmüller-Régent, Senior Researcherin bei WPZ Research, zur Associate Editor der Fachzeitschrift Journal of Tertiary Education and Management (TEAM) ernannt wurde. Die Zeitschrift wird von der EAIR – The European Higher Education Society in Zusammenarbeit mit Springer Nature herausgegeben.

In ihrer neuen Rolle wird sie die Redaktion bei der Auswahl und Begutachtung von wissenschaftlichen Beiträgen unterstützen. Der Fokus der Zeitschrift liegt auf Themen wie Hochschulpolitik, Governance, institutionelle Entwicklung sowie Management im Hochschulsektor. Darüber hinaus arbeitet sie eng mit Autor:innen und Gutachter:innen zusammen, um den Dialog zwischen Forschung, Politik und Praxis im Hochschulbereich zu stärken.

Die Ernennung unterstreicht die internationale Sichtbarkeit der Forschung von WPZ Research im Bereich Hochschulforschung und Wissenschaftspolitik.

Wir gratulieren Verena Grubmüller-Régent herzlich zu dieser neuen Aufgabe und wünschen ihr viel Erfolg bei ihrer Tätigkeit im Redaktionsteam von TEAM.

Im Rahmen des Erasmus+ Projekts CLOUD HED wurden die „Guidelines for a Holistic Approach to Crisis Sensitivity in Higher Education“ veröffentlicht. Die Leitlinien stehen ab sofort öffentlich zur Verfügung und richten sich an Hochschulen sowie Akteur:innen im Hochschulsektor.

Ziel der Guidelines ist es, Hochschulen dabei zu unterstützen, ihre Strukturen und Prozesse krisensensibel auszurichten, ohne dabei akademische Qualität, institutionelle Autonomie oder Chancengleichheit zu beeinträchtigen. Die Entwicklung basiert auf umfassenden Analysen, darunter Literaturrecherchen, Interviews, Dokumentenanalysen sowie vergleichende Untersuchungen von Curricula.

Die Leitlinien umfassen drei zentrale Handlungsfelder:

 – Management und Governance

 – Lehre, Curriculum und Studierendenunterstützung

 – Technische Infrastruktur

Ergänzt werden die inhaltlichen Empfehlungen durch praxisorientierte Checklisten, die Hochschulen bei der Implementierung unterstützen sollen.

Die vollständigen Guidelines sind über die Projektwebsite abrufbar. https://www.cloud-hed.eu/results

Bleiben Sie informiert und abonnieren Sie den CLOUD HED Newsletter, um aktuelle Entwicklungen und Projektergebnisse zu erhalten.

Presentation  Special Issue “New Models of the University – Innovative Structures, Adaptive Responses, and Strategic Behavior”

On February 12, 2026, the editors for the Special Issue „New Models of the University“ of the ZfHE (Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung) hosed an event to present selected contributions. As universities worldwide face unprecedented challenges – from technological disruption to shifting societal expectations and internationalisation – it is crucial to critically reassess the role, structure, and purpose of higher education institutions. This issue of ZFHE brings together contributions that explore evolving institutional models, theoretical perspectives from classical to contemporary scholarship, and the ways universities are adapting to external pressures such as global competition, digitalisation, and changing policy and funding environments.

Verena Régent, Senior Researcher at WPZ Research and coordinator of the Erasmus+-funded CLOUD HED project https://www.cloud-hed.eu/ , presented her co-authored contribution „Continuity and Accessibility in Higher Education Amid Armed Conflict“. Rooted in organisational theory and concepts of disaster resilience, the paper presents three interview-based case studies (Sumy State University in Ukraine, Tel-Hai University in Israel and University of Belgrade in Serbia) of HEIs confronted with ongoing/past conflicts and their crisis adaptation and mitigation strategies. In spite of the geographical and historical differences, common denominators could be found, such as a shift to remote teaching, support through informal networks and the role of the crisis as catalyst for institutional transformation.

CLOUD HED contribution: https://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/view/2207/1651

The Green University Toolbox represents the central outcome of the Erasmus+ co-funded project GET-AHED and provides higher education institutions with practical tools, resources, and guidance to advance sustainability, climate action, and institutional transformation. Developed through close cooperation between partners and stakeholders, the Green University Toolbox is designed to support universities and universities of applied sciences in embedding sustainability across governance, teaching, research, and campus operations.

With the launch of the Green University Toolbox, GET-AHED leaves a lasting legacy: an openly accessible, practice-oriented resource supporting higher education institutions across Europe in their green transition.

The University Greening Toolbox is now publicly available at: https://green-uni-toolbox.eu/

The Toolbox provides a structured and accessible framework to support sustainability efforts in higher education institutions. Key components include:

  • The Green Self-Assessment Toolkit to help institutions assess their sustainability performance, identify areas for improvement and receive inspiration for discovering sustainability potential;
  • Green Training Programmes for HEIs, focusing on green governance, institutional strategy and capacity building; and
  • Green Case Studies and examples of practice drawn from European higher education institutions.

The Toolbox can be used independently or as part of broader institutional development processes. It supports evidence-based decision-making and encourages knowledge exchange across institutions.

The Toolbox can be used in many flexible and creative ways across higher education institutions. Some HEIs integrate it into internal strategic development processes, using it to structure discussions on sustainability priorities and long-term goals, while others draw on it as a source of inspiration to strengthen sustainability initiatives across different units. Its whole-university perspective makes it particularly valuable for intra-institutional dialogue, helping to connect sustainability efforts across governance, teaching, research, and campus operations.

Beyond strategy, the Toolbox supports reflection and learning. Institutions can repeat the self-assessment over time to monitor progress and identify areas for improvement. Educators increasingly use the Toolbox in teaching, inviting students to explore its resources or assess their own institution, which often sparks rich discussions about how sustainability is understood and practiced. In this way, the Toolbox not only informs institutional change but also encourages critical reflection on the sustainability of projects, policies, and everyday practices within higher education.

Watch the webinar on the University Greening Toolbox: https://youtu.be/QQnkVdXIoNw

Die Hochschulstrategie 2040 ist zentral für Österreichs Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Wir brauchen Hochschulen mit einer klugen Gesamtsteuerung und mit modernen Studien‑ & Weiterbildungsangeboten, die den Fachkräftemangel – vor allem im MINT – spürbar reduzieren.

Brigitte Ecker präsentierte in der Veranstaltung am 16. Jänner 2026, die im Festsaal der Industriellenvereinigung stattfand, die Potenziale in der Hochschulentwicklung und die für das österreichische Hochschulsystem notwendigen Veränderungen.